Author: Joost Buijs
Date: 11:49:56 09/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 11, 2003 at 13:28:51, Michael P. Nance Sr. wrote: >On September 11, 2003 at 02:05:49, Joost Buijs wrote: > >>On September 10, 2003 at 20:11:11, Sietel Monic wrote: >> >>>Ok well I have decided to go dual Amd Athlon MP for running df7. Now my question >>>is how much better is the 2800+ compared to the others? I dont want to buy it >>>for say like 100 more kn/s over say the 2200+ which is 1.8 ghz. >>>Mainly if anyone could give me a rouph scale of kn/s on each one. >>>2800+: x kn/s with df7 >>>2600+: x kn/s with df7 >>>2400+: x kn/s with df7 >>>2200+: x kn/s with df7 >>>Hopfully dual amd athlon mp 2800+ can get me 2,500 or around the kn/s, Anyone >>>know?? >> >>I have had a dual 1800+ and 2600+ in the past, and a dual 2800+ right now. >>On DF7 mark with 64Mb. hash it looks like this: >> >>1800+ 1450 kn/sec. >>2600+ 2050 kn/sec. >>2800+ 2100 kn/sec. >> >>At my work I have a dual Xeon 3.06, with hyperthreading this machine gives 2450 >>kn/sec. But it is not only kn/sec. that matters, with hyperthreading on the >>program runs with twice the number of threads, it is possible that this has a >>negative influence on the search efficiency. >> >>Way to go is dual Opteron 246 or 248, the last one is coming soon. >>With df7 I expect at least 3000 kn/sec. with such a machine. > >I'll let You know what a pair of 246's will do in a few Days.>>>>Mike I am very curious about this! My guess is that a pair of 246's will run about 2700 kn/sec. with df7 (fritzmark 64Mb.) I want to buy a dual Opteron soon, but now I decided to wait for the 248, and Windows/64 to arrive. Personally I don't like Linux, it is still very primitive compared to Windows.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.