Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 00:31:39 09/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2003 at 02:44:14, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >Results of a blitz tournament published at CSS Forum, maybe the first >sign that Hiarcs9 prefers longer time controls (I would like this >behaviour) > >AMD Athlon 2400+xp, 256MB HT, own books, blitz 5m+2s > >1) 18.5/28 Deep Junior 8 >2) 17.0/28 Shredder 7.04 >3) 15.5/28 Deep Fritz 7 >4) 15.0/28 Fritz 8 >5) 14.0/28 Gambit Tiger 2 >6) 14.0/28 Junior 8 >7) 10.5/28 Chess Tiger 15 >8) 07.5/28 Hiarcs 9 > >Kurt Can you obtain the database for that tournament, Kurt? It in no way reflects any of the blitz testing I've done in the last year with Hiarcs 9 Development. The only program on that list that H9 didn't consistently best on equal hardware was Shredder, which often was equal, slightly ahead, or slightly behind on each sequence of 100 games at 5m+3s. Unless something really bad happened with the book... -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.