Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 01:21:25 09/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2003 at 03:31:39, enrico carrisco wrote:
>On September 12, 2003 at 02:44:14, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>Results of a blitz tournament published at CSS Forum, maybe the first
>>sign that Hiarcs9 prefers longer time controls (I would like this
>>behaviour)
>>
>>AMD Athlon 2400+xp, 256MB HT, own books, blitz 5m+2s
>>
>>1) 18.5/28 Deep Junior 8
>>2) 17.0/28 Shredder 7.04
>>3) 15.5/28 Deep Fritz 7
>>4) 15.0/28 Fritz 8
>>5) 14.0/28 Gambit Tiger 2
>>6) 14.0/28 Junior 8
>>7) 10.5/28 Chess Tiger 15
>>8) 07.5/28 Hiarcs 9
>>
>>Kurt
>
>Can you obtain the database for that tournament, Kurt? It in no way reflects
>any of the blitz testing I've done in the last year with Hiarcs 9 Development.
>
>The only program on that list that H9 didn't consistently best on equal hardware
>was Shredder, which often was equal, slightly ahead, or slightly behind on each
>sequence of 100 games at 5m+3s.
>
>Unless something really bad happened with the book...
>
>-elc.
I am trying to get these games.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.