Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Face, or INTERface?

Author: Alastair Scott

Date: 04:09:20 09/12/03

Go up one level in this thread


On September 12, 2003 at 06:53:47, stuart taylor wrote:

>When a new program comes out, some people can't think of anything more important
>than the interface!
>Isn't it a bit like thinking only about the face when it comes to a woman? (or
>other external features, rather than true qualities)
>S.Taylor

This is a false analogy because, in the case of chess software, the "true
qualities" are inevitably refined to a wonderfully high standard. The engine has
become less important (!) because, for 99 per cent of users, it is so
overwhelmingly strong it barely matters what it is.

Thus the means of using what the engine offers - and, more importantly, watering
them down - become much more important. That is a huge turnaround from 10 years
ago when engines _were_ differentiable by people like me :)

(Similarly with a word processor, for example; nobody cares about facilities
such as the word wrapping, hyphenation and font placement algorithms because
they "just work", albeit after many years of experimentation and effort to find
the best way of doing them, but change a keyboard shortcut or make other
arbitrary alterations to the user interface and there will be trouble!).

Alastair



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.