Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: No I meant mate in 3

Author: Dana Turnmire

Date: 08:07:16 09/12/03

Go up one level in this thread


On September 12, 2003 at 09:25:55, Markus Pillen wrote:

>On September 12, 2003 at 08:05:16, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On September 12, 2003 at 06:50:45, Markus Pillen wrote:
>>
>>>On September 12, 2003 at 02:15:13, Dana Turnmire wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 12, 2003 at 02:13:56, Dana Turnmire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In the following position Chessmaster 9000 finds mate in 3 in a matter of
>>>>>seconds yet Genius 7 will only find mate in 14 in 45 seconds. It doesn't matter
>>>>>if I change the selective search to brute strength or anything in between. For
>>>>>some reason Genius cannot find it.  Even in the "find mate" mode.  Strange.  [
>>>>[d] 3R4/3R3p/5p1k/6n1/8/1P2QPPq/r7/6K1 w - -
>>>
>>>Analysis by Chessmaster 9000,
>>>he can“t find a Mate in 3 in a matter of seconds
>>>Best regards
>>>Markus
>>
>>I guess that the poster meant mate in 13 but did not press the 1 strong enough.
>>
>>Uri
>
>Yes, 10 min after my post i came to the same result :-)
>
>Markus

The mentor lines gives -Mate03 in 5 seconds. 1. Qe2 Rxe2 2. Rxh7+ Nxh7 3. Rh8
Qg2#

When I enter the move 1. Qe2 in Genius 7 it immediately states Mate in 3.
[d] 3R4/3R3p/5p1k/6n1/8/1P2QPPq/r7/6K1 w - -





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.