Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 12:54:40 09/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2003 at 15:42:54, Bob Durrett wrote: >I really believe that the "tests" I'm running are quite revealing and far more >relevant to my interests. I see no need to resort to counting wins and losses. >That would be a waste of time for me since I don't play against chess engines. >Why should I care whether or not one engine can whip another??????????? It was *YOU* that stated: ------------------ In such a competition, I suspect that Crafty would come out on top of the rating list simply because Hyatt says Crafty does very little pruning. [This assumes that the Crafty operator does not shut the engine off due to boredom. : )] ------------------- If you can't validly substantiate your claims and aren't willing to defend them, THEN PLEASE DON'T MAKE ANY. And as for your 'relevant' tests, are those the ones where you look at the score of multiple engines and conclude that the one that is 'out of line' must necessarily have 'something wrong' with it? ...Riiiiight -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.