Author: Matthew White
Date: 18:07:02 09/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2003 at 03:31:39, enrico carrisco wrote: >On September 12, 2003 at 02:44:14, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>Results of a blitz tournament published at CSS Forum, maybe the first >>sign that Hiarcs9 prefers longer time controls (I would like this >>behaviour) >> >>AMD Athlon 2400+xp, 256MB HT, own books, blitz 5m+2s >> >>1) 18.5/28 Deep Junior 8 >>2) 17.0/28 Shredder 7.04 >>3) 15.5/28 Deep Fritz 7 >>4) 15.0/28 Fritz 8 >>5) 14.0/28 Gambit Tiger 2 >>6) 14.0/28 Junior 8 >>7) 10.5/28 Chess Tiger 15 >>8) 07.5/28 Hiarcs 9 >> >>Kurt > >Can you obtain the database for that tournament, Kurt? It in no way reflects >any of the blitz testing I've done in the last year with Hiarcs 9 Development. > >The only program on that list that H9 didn't consistently best on equal hardware >was Shredder, which often was equal, slightly ahead, or slightly behind on each >sequence of 100 games at 5m+3s. > >Unless something really bad happened with the book... > >-elc. The reason for the discrepancy might be that the Hiarcs book is brand new, so it hasn't had much learning yet. I find that when I get a new engine, the play is not nearly as strong as after it has learned some...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.