Author: William Penn
Date: 04:10:13 09/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2003 at 23:56:53, K. Burcham wrote: > >why? what is your purpose? what is your mhz size now? > >post an example of a position that you think such a large hash setting will >help. even if you find a position that a program can see a better move because >of large hash table, 800 meg+, what would we do with this data? what will this >data prove? > >I think that ram sizes and the ability of the operating systems to handle these >large amounts of memory are in proportion to mhz that is available to us today. >When a 10 ghz for a home desktop is available to the common consumer for a home >desktop, i feel the ram sizes will be in proportion. I also feel that the chess >programs will keep up, to utilize this technology. > >kburcham I have plenty of processor capacity, an AMD Athlon XP 2400+ running at 2.0GHz. So there's no problem in that regard. I don't have to post a position, nor prove anything! That's irrelevant. I just want the ability to select the desired hash size. Simple. An ordinary user option. The operation involved does not work correctly. I suppose that's another bug. It prompts to ask whether it should disregard the recommended hash limit, but then fails to proceed accordingly. WP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.