Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 13:27:22 09/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2003 at 16:19:14, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On September 12, 2003 at 16:14:10, Bob Durrett wrote: > >>No, I never said "must necessarily have 'something wrong' with it." If you >>review the thread, you will see that those were your words, not mine. > >Is this why the thread is titled 'What is Wrong with Shredder 7.0.4's Position >Evaluations?' > >>Lets put this on a more serious note: I claim that the results I'm seeing >>cause me to tentatively conclude that Shredder needs more work insofar as it's >>displayed position evaluation scores [and evaluation symbols] are concerned. > >I completely disagree with this, and gave reasons throughout the thread. > >Proving it either way is another matter. We haven't solved chess yet, >so we don't know for certain whose evaluation is more correct in most cases. If we HAD solved chess, wouldn't all evaluations be either 0, positive infinity, or negative infinity?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.