Author: stuart taylor
Date: 16:09:06 09/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 2003 at 18:33:33, Roy Eassa wrote:
>On September 13, 2003 at 18:26:45, Roy Eassa wrote:
>
>>On September 13, 2003 at 15:36:13, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>In der zweiten Partie schlug Junior 8 mit einer hübschen Partie unter Blitz und
>>>Donner zurück
>>>
>>>In the second game it was Junior8 to win with a very nice kingside
>>>attack.
>>>
>>>[D]r5k1/1b2r2p/1q2p1p1/nppnN1N1/8/7P/1P2QPP1/RB2R1K1 w - - 0 26
>>>Junior 8 vs Hiarcs 9 [position before 26.Bxg6!]
>>>
>>>[Event "Hia9_Jun8 Dur 1.3/64 90m+30s"]
>>>[Site "Switzerland"]
>>>[Date "2003.09.13"]
>>>[Round "2"]
>>>[White "Junior 8"]
>>>[Black "Hiarcs 9"]
>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>[ECO "C92"]
>>>[Annotator "Utzinger,K"]
>>>[PlyCount "67"]
>>>
>>>{W=16.0 ply; 1'095kN/s; 1 TBAs
>>>B=11.8 ply; 143kN/s; 1 TBAs
>>>} 1. e4 {0} 1...
>>>e5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} 2... Nc6 {0} 3. Bb5 {0} 3... a6 {0} 4. Ba4 {0} 4... Nf6 {0}
>>>5. O-O {0} 5... Be7 {0} 6. Re1 {0} 6... b5 {0} 7. Bb3 {0} 7... d6 {0} 8. c3 {0}
>>>8... O-O {0} 9. h3 {0} 9... Bb7 {0} 10. d4 {0} 10... Re8 {0} 11. Nbd2 {0} 11...
>>>Bf8 {0} 12. a4 {0} 12... exd4 {White last book move 0} 13. cxd4 {0.61/15 120}
>>>13... Na5 {0} 14. Bc2 {0.52/17 248} 14... c5 {Black last book move 0} 15. dxc5
>>>{0.47/16 179} 15... dxc5 {Not a good opening choice against attacker Junior8
>>>which now has a mobile pawn majority on the kings wing / Keine gute
>>>Eroeffnungswahl gegen Angreifer Junior8, das nun eine mobile Bauernmehrheit am
>>>Koenigsfluegel besitzt 0.20/12 163} 16. e5 {0.40/16 150} 16... Nd5 {0.20/12 438
>>>} 17. Qe2 {(Nf1) 0.52/16 229} 17... Qb6 {(Nf4) 0.05/11 373} 18. Ne4 {
>>>(axb5) 0.49/15 343} 18... Nb4 {(c4) -0.08/11 199} 19. Bf4 {(Bd2) 0.44/15 146}
>>>19... Be7 {(Rad8) -0.20/11 272} 20. axb5 {0.58/15 225} 20... axb5 {(Qxb5) Black
>>>misses the exchange of the dangerous white coloured bishop of Junior8 with 20..
>>>.Nxc2 / Schwarz verpasst es, den weissfeldrigen gegnerischen Laeufer mit 20...
>>>Sxc2 zu tauschen -0.14/11 196} 21. Bb1 {0.55/16 221} 21... Nd5 {
>>>(Nc4) -0.16/10 94} 22. Bg5 {(Qc2) 0.88/15 179} 22... Bxg5 {(c4) 0.15/11 336}
>>>23. Nexg5 {0.65/14 140} 23... g6 {0.35/11 141} 24. e6 {
>>>! Starting a deadly attack / Start zum toedlichen Angriff 1.10/15 95} 24...
>>>fxe6 {0.48/11 466} 25. Ne5 {(Nxh7) There is no sufficient defence for Hiarcs 9
>>>/ Es gibt bereits keine befriedigende Verteidigung mehr fuer Hiarcs 9 1.09/16
>>>205} 25... Re7 {(Nc4) 1.13/10 597} 26. Bxg6 {
>>>A decisive sacrifice / Ein entscheidendes Opfer 2.47/14 84} 26... hxg6 {
>>>(Nf4) 2.41/11 652} 27. Nxg6 {2.82/14 47} 27... e5 {3.84/12 728} 28. Qh5 {
>>>(Nxe7+) 3.64/15 60} 28... Qf6 {3.55/11 66} 29. Rxe5 {4.20/16 234} 29... Qg7 {
>>>4.20/11 287} 30. Ne6 {(Nxe7+) 5.22/16 132} 30... Rxe6 {4.41/12 215} 31. Rxe6 {
>>>5.52/15 140} 31... Nf6 {4.41/12 59} 32. Qf5 {5.89/15 91} 32... Bc8 {5.28/12 209
>>>} 33. Qxf6 {(Qf3) 6.19/15 119} 33... Qxf6 {5.99/13 256} 34. Rxf6 {6.79/17 60}
>>>1-0
>>
>>
>>Fritz thinks 23...h6 was a lot better than 23...g6.
>
>
>One interesting line, where White sacrifices & chases Black's king all the way
>to a7, ends in a draw:
>
>23...h6 24. e6!? hxg5 25. exf7+ Kxf7 26. Ne5+ Rxe5! 27. Qh5+! Ke6 28. Qg6+ Kd7
>29. Qxg7+ Re7 30. Rxe7+ Nxe7 31. Bf5+ Kc7 32. Qxe7+ Kb8 33. Qf8+ Ka7 34. Rxa5+
>Qxa5 35. Qxc5+ =
So perhaps it was simply a semi-long-range tactical oversight which Hiarcs
didn't see coming. The win by Junior is still very great, and well-deserved, but
I've always wished that people would be able to assign an estimated level of
value of win, or value of play in any given game.
S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.