Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 10:55:04 11/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 1998 at 09:01:26, Graham Laight wrote: >Forgive me if this has already been discussed in a previous thread which I >missed, but what effect does selecting "anti-grandmaster" have on the play of >rebel 10? It tries to keep the initiative against humans. It tried to achieve this goal partially e.g. by playing creative sacrifices, placing rooks on strategically important lines ... Because it's not easy to tell if e.g. a sacrifice will prove to be beneficial in the end, the default setting for anti-GM is "smart" which tries to make "creative" moves only when it seems to be "save" to do this (i.e. when enough preconditions in a certain position are met, the anti-GM evaluation will be used at strong or active setting). For some example positions see Ed's site (www.rebel.nl) or my overdue ;-) review of Rebel 10 (to be released soon ...). Moritz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.