Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 11:58:35 09/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 2003 at 13:27:35, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 15, 2003 at 12:45:11, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On September 15, 2003 at 11:23:26, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On September 15, 2003 at 10:37:18, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>> >>>>On September 15, 2003 at 09:11:25, emerson tan wrote: >>>> >>>>From deep blue log file: Nxe6 came from book trivially. >>>> >>>>Nxe6 is a well known win. h6 is very poor simply. Of course all books say >>>>'unclear' and only against Qe7 they say it is a clear loss for black. However >>>>show me 1 GM that plays it. >>> >>>No GM play it proves nothing. >> >>that proves a lot in a line played a lot in chess. i play myself caro-kann too >>as you can see in your database. it proves really a lot if so quick in the game >>in mainlines, btw this mainline was invented by kasparov in kasparov-karpov if i >>may recall, that such a line is not played by strong players. I can assure you >>i'm never going to play h6 in that line. >> >>>Maybe they prefer other lines because they did not like to learn the line of >>>Nxe6 because they need to learn a lot of lines to play it well. >> >>Stop the nonsense circle redenations please. >> >>If i can play for free h6 without getting bombed to hell by some very trivial >>simple playing sacrafices, after which even some idiots who just attack like >>crazy will beat you, then i sure will play h6 there. >> >>However it isn't possible to play h6, so only Bd6 is possible after which the >>knight is still strong at g5. >> >>I hope you realize some basic things of development very well. IF black can play >>h6 there because nxe6 is not going to win, then of course everyone goes h6 >>there. >> >>However the opposite is true. I am very sure that diepeveen-uri blass >>blindfolded is going to be 1-0 there. Oh wait, even in corr games you're just >>2000 rated (note that is lower than the computers have when not operated by uri >>blass) and i'm blindfolded 2100. Damn, no one is going to bet at you! > >No > >I am not 2000 rated in correspondence chess. >I simply did not play enough correspondence games to get a rating. > >The only games that I have for rating are the israeli final 6.5/8 and now in the >olympiad I have 2 points out of 3 games with 2 draws and a win(there is a report >that I have 1.5 out of 3 but that report is a mistake and it is going to be >corrected) > >> >>>Maybe the GM who like to play this line do not play the opening because they >>>know that the opponent does not have to sacrifice and they may need to >>>play a game that they do not like. >> >>GM's play for a win with white. Nxe6 wins, so who cares? > >I try to explain why not to play the line with black. >A possible reason is that you do not like options of white that are not Nxe6 This is not a possible reason. There are only two options. 8.Nh3 is obviously fine for black (please dont ask me for a proof) and after 8.Ne4 white has lost two moves (Ng5,Ne4) when black has played the useful move h6. > >Maybe the GM's who like to play it with black simply do not like other lines of >the caro-kann. This explanation is not convincing either. Michael > >> >>>>Oh wait a minute, long before that match Kasparov-Deep Blue, didn't kasparov >>>>co-author some books saying Nxe6 is a win for white? >>> >>>Do you believe everything that kasparov says? >> >>In this case sure :) >> >>>I admit that I did not investigate the position enough to know the result of >>>Nxe6 but I think that the same is for you >> >>So with your board rating of 1000, as you are not allowed to use computers there >>(btw those are higher rated without you behind the keyboard), you didn't even >>investigate it with deep shredder 7.04 yet. > >My board rating is not 1000 >You invent numbers. > >I had a fide rating in the past. >I lost it but my israeli rating is stable near 2000(the last rating is 1997). > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.