Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 12:56:50 09/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 2003 at 03:35:57, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote: >On September 14, 2003 at 14:05:13, Sune Larsson wrote: > >> >> [D]8/2r3kp/6p1/4Kp2/8/7P/5P2/R7 w - - 0 1 >> >> This position happened today in NM, Århus between >> FM Naes and GM Gausel. Is it dead lost for white? >> > >Baburin have this endgame in todays ChessToday. I added some of his suggestions >below. > > >> This is how it all ended: >> >> >>[Event "NM"] >>[Site "Århus"] >>[Date "2003.??.??"] >>[Round "?"] >>[White "Naes, Flovin Tor"] >>[Black "Gausel, Einar"] >>[Result "0-1"] >>[SetUp "1"] >>[FEN "8/2r3kp/6p1/4Kp2/8/7P/5P2/R7 w - - 0 1"] >>[PlyCount "32"] >>[EventDate "2003.??.??"] >>[SourceDate "2001.01.01"] >> >>1. Kf4 Kh6 2. Ra3 Kh5 3. Kg3 g5 4. Rb3 > >4.f4!? h6 5.fxg5 hxg5 6.Ra8 and a theoretical draw. > >> 4...f4+ 5. Kg2 Kh4 6. Ra3 Rc2 7. Rb3 > >7.Ra7! h5 8.Rf7 is easier. > >>7...h5 8. Rf3 > >8.Rb4! > >>8...Rb2 9. Kh2 Rb4 10. Ra3 g4 11. hxg4 hxg4 12. Ra1 > >He gives 12.Ra1?? and suggest (only mainline here) >12.Ra8 Rb2 13.Rh8+ Kg5 14.Rg8+ Kf5 15.Kg1 f3 16.Rf8+ Ke4 17.Rg8= > >>12...Rb2 13. Kg1 Kh3 14. Rc1 f3 >>15. Ra1 g3 16. Rf1 Ra2 0-1 >> >> >>/S > >All his comments ( and corrections if I have made some error) can be read in >CT-1042 > >Odd Gunnar Many thanks for your post! In my teens I learned that f-g-h vs g-h is drawn, while f-g-h vs f-h presents the defending side a lot of problems. But from that to an easy win, as displayed by Gausel, hmmmm... Sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.