Author: Odd Gunnar Malin
Date: 23:06:49 09/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 2003 at 15:56:50, Sune Larsson wrote: >On September 15, 2003 at 03:35:57, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote: > >>On September 14, 2003 at 14:05:13, Sune Larsson wrote: >> >>> >>> [D]8/2r3kp/6p1/4Kp2/8/7P/5P2/R7 w - - 0 1 >>> >>> This position happened today in NM, Århus between >>> FM Naes and GM Gausel. Is it dead lost for white? >>> >> >>Baburin have this endgame in todays ChessToday. I added some of his suggestions >>below. >> >> >>> This is how it all ended: >>> >>> >>>[Event "NM"] >>>[Site "Århus"] >>>[Date "2003.??.??"] >>>[Round "?"] >>>[White "Naes, Flovin Tor"] >>>[Black "Gausel, Einar"] >>>[Result "0-1"] >>>[SetUp "1"] >>>[FEN "8/2r3kp/6p1/4Kp2/8/7P/5P2/R7 w - - 0 1"] >>>[PlyCount "32"] >>>[EventDate "2003.??.??"] >>>[SourceDate "2001.01.01"] >>> >>>1. Kf4 Kh6 2. Ra3 Kh5 3. Kg3 g5 4. Rb3 >> >>4.f4!? h6 5.fxg5 hxg5 6.Ra8 and a theoretical draw. >> >>> 4...f4+ 5. Kg2 Kh4 6. Ra3 Rc2 7. Rb3 >> >>7.Ra7! h5 8.Rf7 is easier. >> >>>7...h5 8. Rf3 >> >>8.Rb4! >> >>>8...Rb2 9. Kh2 Rb4 10. Ra3 g4 11. hxg4 hxg4 12. Ra1 >> >>He gives 12.Ra1?? and suggest (only mainline here) >>12.Ra8 Rb2 13.Rh8+ Kg5 14.Rg8+ Kf5 15.Kg1 f3 16.Rf8+ Ke4 17.Rg8= >> >>>12...Rb2 13. Kg1 Kh3 14. Rc1 f3 >>>15. Ra1 g3 16. Rf1 Ra2 0-1 >>> >>> >>>/S >> >>All his comments ( and corrections if I have made some error) can be read in >>CT-1042 >> >>Odd Gunnar > > > Many thanks for your post! In my teens I learned that f-g-h vs g-h is drawn, > while f-g-h vs f-h presents the defending side a lot of problems. But from that > to an easy win, as displayed by Gausel, hmmmm... > > Sune Just an add. The line 7.Ra7 h5 8.Rf7 are withdrawn in todays number. Odd Gunnar (PS. I sent you the actual number of ct as a promotion)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.