Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:35:19 09/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2003 at 11:27:48, Bob Durrett wrote: >On September 16, 2003 at 06:53:53, Uri Blass wrote: > >>Here is a game of the player who is interested to play against computers with a >>lot of analysis. >> >>He claims at move 36 he had no more than a draw. >> >>I find it hard to believe when I see the position of the poor black rook that >>cannot move but I had no time to analyze the game seriously. >> >>I am also interested in your opinion about the exchange sacrifice that he >>prepared that did not happen in the game(20.hxg4). > >I copied the game into chessbase and then started to look for 20.hxg4. I don't >see how that move could have been played on White's 20th move. Did you post the >correct game? Or . . . is it not on the 20th move? > >Bob D. It is on the 20th move but of a side line that is mentioned and analyzed (20.hxg4 could not happen in the game) 20.hxg4 could happen in the line 17...Qh4+ 18.g3 Qh5 19.Kf2 Ng4+ 20.hxg4 This line also is mentioned in the game Here is the position before 20.hxg4 I did not analyze it at this moment to decide if it is good but the move was analyzed by tansel and he believes that it is good. [D]r5k1/p1pp1rpp/b1n1p3/2P2p1q/1P3Pn1/P1Q1P1PP/1B2NK2/R4B1R w - - 0 20 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.