Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 08:43:14 09/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 2003 at 11:35:19, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 16, 2003 at 11:27:48, Bob Durrett wrote: > >>On September 16, 2003 at 06:53:53, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>Here is a game of the player who is interested to play against computers with a >>>lot of analysis. >>> >>>He claims at move 36 he had no more than a draw. >>> >>>I find it hard to believe when I see the position of the poor black rook that >>>cannot move but I had no time to analyze the game seriously. >>> >>>I am also interested in your opinion about the exchange sacrifice that he >>>prepared that did not happen in the game(20.hxg4). >> >>I copied the game into chessbase and then started to look for 20.hxg4. I don't >>see how that move could have been played on White's 20th move. Did you post the >>correct game? Or . . . is it not on the 20th move? >> >>Bob D. > >It is on the 20th move but of a side line that is mentioned and analyzed >(20.hxg4 could not happen in the game) OK, I found it. Will look at it in the next few days when I find time. Bob D. > >20.hxg4 could happen in the line > >17...Qh4+ 18.g3 Qh5 19.Kf2 Ng4+ 20.hxg4 > >This line also is mentioned in the game > >Here is the position before 20.hxg4 >I did not analyze it at this moment to decide if it is good but the move was >analyzed by tansel and he believes that it is good. > >[D]r5k1/p1pp1rpp/b1n1p3/2P2p1q/1P3Pn1/P1Q1P1PP/1B2NK2/R4B1R w - - 0 20 > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.