Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:25:10 09/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 2003 at 12:56:51, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On September 17, 2003 at 12:26:09, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On September 17, 2003 at 11:32:21, Drexel,Michael wrote: >> >>>On September 17, 2003 at 10:11:12, Mihaly Szalai wrote: >>> >>>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. c3 >>>>d5 9. exd5 e4 10. Ng5 Bg4 11. Qc2 Ne5 12. Nxe4 Nxe4 13. Qxe4 Bd6 14. d4 f5 15. >>>>Qc2 >>>> >>>>[D]r2q1rk1/2p3pp/p2b4/1p1Pnp2/3P2b1/1BP5/PPQ2PPP/RNB1R1K1 b - - 0 15 >>>> >>>>Chessprograms are strong in tactics (so they say...) >>>>How fast is your engine finding 15...Nf3+? >>>> >>>>Mihaly >>> >>>I immediately knew: This is a position for Chessmaster and especially for AntiCM >>>settings. >>>Here you go: >>> >>>r2q1rk1/2p3pp/p2b4/1p1Pnp2/3P2b1/1BP5/PPQ2PPP/RNB1R1K1 b - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by AntiCM: >>> >>>15...Ng6 16.h3 Re8 17.Re6 >>> ± (1.02) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >>>15...Ng6 16.h3 Re8 17.Re6 >>> ± (1.02) Depth: 4 00:00:00 >>>15...Ng6 16.h3 Re8 17.Be3 f4 18.hxg4 fxe3 19.Rxe3 Rxe3 20.fxe3 >>> ± (1.14) Depth: 5 00:00:00 >>>15...Ng6 16.h3 Bh5 17.a4 Nf4 18.axb5 axb5 >>> ± (1.05) Depth: 6 00:00:00 41kN >>>15...Nd7 16.Qd3 Qh4 17.h3 Bh5 18.a4 Rae8 19.Re6 >>> ± (1.01) Depth: 6 00:00:00 55kN >>>15...Nd7 16.h3 Bh5 17.c4 Re8 18.Be3 Qg5 19.Qd2 >>> ± (1.00) Depth: 7 00:00:00 143kN >>>15...Nd7 16.h3 Bh5 17.c4 Re8 18.Rxe8+ Qxe8 19.Bd2 Bg6 20.Nc3 f4 >>> ± (0.99) Depth: 8 00:00:01 303kN >>>15...Ng6 16.Nd2 Qh4 17.Nf1 Rfe8 18.Be3 f4 19.Bd2 Qf6 20.Qd3 >>> ± (0.81) Depth: 8 00:00:03 631kN >>>15...Ng6 16.h3 Qh4 17.Qd3 Bh5 18.Qf1 Nf4 19.a4 Rae8 20.axb5 Rxe1 21.Qxe1 axb5 >>>22.Bxf4 Qxf4 >>> ± (0.71) Depth: 9 00:00:05 1207kN >>>15...Ng6 16.h3 Qh4 17.Qd3 Bh5 18.Bd1 Bxd1 19.Qxd1 Rfe8 20.Re6 Rxe6 21.dxe6 >>> ² (0.70) Depth: 10 00:00:11 2559kN >>>15...Nf3+ 16.gxf3 Qh4 17.fxg4 Qxh2+ 18.Kf1 f4 19.Ke2 Rfe8+ 20.Kd1 Rxe1+ 21.Kxe1 >>>Re8+ 22.Be3 fxe3 23.Qf5 exf2+ 24.Kd1 >>> = (-0.06) Depth: 10 00:00:17 4169kN >>>15...Nf3+ 16.gxf3 Qh4 17.Re5 Bxe5 18.dxe5 Bxf3 19.Nd2 Qg5+ 20.Kf1 Bg2+ 21.Ke1 f4 >>>22.d6+ Kh8 23.f3 Bh3 24.Qd3 Qg1+ 25.Nf1 cxd6 26.exd6 >>> = (-0.18) Depth: 11 00:00:36 9268kN >>>15...Nf3+ 16.gxf3 Qh4 17.Re5 Bxe5 18.dxe5 Bxf3 19.Nd2 Qg5+ 20.Kf1 Bg2+ 21.Ke1 f4 >>>22.e6 Rad8 23.f3 Qh5 24.Ke2 Qxh2 >>> = (-0.11) Depth: 12 00:01:02 16741kN >>>15...Nf3+ 16.gxf3 Qh4 17.Re5 Bxe5 18.dxe5 Bh3 19.d6+ Kh8 20.Be6 Qh5 21.Qd2 Qg6+ >>>22.Qg5 Qxe6 23.Qe7 Qg6+ 24.Qg5 >>> µ (-0.99) Depth: 13 00:02:44 44695kN >>> >>>17 secs ! on a mere AMD 2000+ >>>Now try to beat that with your Duals and Quads. :-) >>> >>>Meanwhile -2.56 >>> >>>Michael >> >>I do not need it. >>old software and old hardware is enough. >> >>Junior7(A1000) needs less than 1 second for 15...Nf3+(only 114 knodes) > >Sorry, Junior 7 is out of the competition. >This program sacrifices knights on f3 just in order to weaken the white King >position. If it has anything for the piece or not is not important. > >The score is not convincing either. > >Michael The score of chessmaster was also not convincing when it found it(only 0.06 pawns for black). You did not talk about time to find winning score for black but about time to find the move. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.