Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why?

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 00:50:11 09/18/03

Go up one level in this thread

On September 17, 2003 at 16:03:09, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On September 17, 2003 at 14:54:41, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On September 17, 2003 at 14:47:49, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>lower clocked opterons are like $300, so i am pretty sure there is a big demand
>>already.
>
>No there isn't, because for single and dual machines, the NUMA issue can
>pretty well be ignored

Ignored? You _will_ get a performance handicap if you do so.

--
GCP

• Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why? Robert Hyatt 08:06:13 09/18/03
  • Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 15:32:23 09/18/03
    • Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why? Robert Hyatt 14:19:29 09/19/03
    • Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why? Eugene Nalimov 16:06:54 09/18/03
      • Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 01:15:49 09/19/03
        • Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why? Robert Hyatt 14:27:00 09/19/03
      • Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why? Vincent Diepeveen 16:43:30 09/18/03
  • Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why? Vincent Diepeveen 08:14:09 09/18/03
    • Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why? Robert Hyatt 08:53:11 09/18/03
      • Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why? Vincent Diepeveen 08:58:53 09/18/03
        • Re: Hyperthreading question on duals, I know it's bad but why? Robert Hyatt 10:24:08 09/18/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.