Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:35:14 09/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2003 at 08:30:49, Tony Werten wrote: >On September 18, 2003 at 08:11:49, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On September 18, 2003 at 07:36:25, Tony Werten wrote: >> >>>On September 18, 2003 at 06:30:27, macaroni wrote: >>> >>>>thats an example position it got to, it gives about a -0.1 for that position, >>>>when clearly it is hopeless, the pawns broken up, and very bad pieces. >>> >>>The position doesn't seem to be lost ( for a computer that is ) >>> >>>After 30 min XiniX still gives only -1 ( what it also gave after 1 sec.) >>> >>>Tony >> >>make that -10 > >That looks like a better score, or at least -3 or something. Problem is that >XiniX doesn't see black getting through, so special eval code is activated wich >pulls the score closer to a draw. > >Tony What you mean to say is that your thing is missing a shitload of positional evaluation that shows a score closer to 3 than to 1. Score 1.0 is something even fritz might show based upon having isolated pawns + doubled pawn and a strong knight at e5. the 'black doesn't get through is a bullshit. Black easily gets through. What you mean is that your special 'evaluation function' isn't seeing material win here directly which is trivial because just tactical you can't win games. Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.