Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:34:38 09/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2003 at 10:48:14, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 17, 2003 at 08:00:38, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>Tansel is probably right, that he has not a better position at move 36. > >What i see is 6..Ne4 so the rest is not relevant anymore i guess. >6..Ne4 +=/+- i'd say > >Note that it is nearly impossible to read all that pgn crap it has $ signs and ( >and ) everywhere. No way to follow the game and i'm sure i'm one of the few here >who tried. the rest just cut'n pastes FENs. > >Best regards, >Vincent Fritz8 has no problem to read the pgn I guess that the winner simply copied the pgn from Fritz or Shredder or another chessbase engine. He analyzed a lot of lines backward and forward and saved all of it. A clean pgn was posted in the following link http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?316119 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.