Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:53:11 09/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 2003 at 11:14:09, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 18, 2003 at 11:06:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 18, 2003 at 03:50:11, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On September 17, 2003 at 16:03:09, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On September 17, 2003 at 14:54:41, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On September 17, 2003 at 14:47:49, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>lower clocked opterons are like $300, so i am pretty sure there is a big demand >>>>>already. >>>> >>>>No there isn't, because for single and dual machines, the NUMA issue can >>>>pretty well be ignored >>> >>>Ignored? You _will_ get a performance handicap if you do so. >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>Yes, but on a dual it is a _minimal_ handicap. > >You only going to run Crafty dual? > >Best regards, >Vincent Any remote chance you will ever join a conversation and make any sense? Where did I say I was only going to run dual? I simply said that on a dual opteron, the NUMA issues are not nearly so daunting as they are on a larger box, say 32-way NUMA. Try to understand the topic before tossing out one line nonsense. This _entire_ thread was about hyperthreading. How you diverted it to NUMA / Opteron is unknown...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.