Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 05:49:17 09/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 2003 at 05:59:56, stuart taylor wrote: >I have only now read everyones replies, and I like the fact that most opinions >are calibrated, that playing against computers isn't the best way to improve >ones chess, even though I' also a bit dissapointed that my whole idea for many >years was to do just that, and to improve thereby. > I have long been intending to do it in a disciplined way (like I once tried to, >occasionaly, when my living conditions allowed for it). And I was also waiting >for the the most helpful program to do it with. > For sure, I'm not convinced that this method CAN'T succeed, when it is used in >the maximal way. > And now you are saying that IF a program is good for that, the best would be >Hiarcs 9.0? > Or maybe the ":)" (being a smilie) is a part of the statement. Do you think it was a typo? :) You wrote in a message you will practically never buy Hiarcs 9 therefore my reply. To get serious again. Your question can not be answered in general. It depends on the players weaknesses. Michael > >I thank you all for your replies and welcome more. >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.