Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 15:16:03 09/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 19, 2003 at 16:04:26, George Tsavdaris wrote:
>On September 19, 2003 at 13:55:43, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>Final result
>>------------
>>
>> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + -
>>
>> 1 Shredder 7.04 : 43.5/ 70 62.1 2489 2576 72 58
>> 2 The King 3.23 skr : 43.0/ 70 61.4 2490 2571 72 56
>> 3 Junior 8 : 41.5/ 70 59.3 2492 2557 74 61
>> 4 Fritz 8 : 39.5/ 70 56.4 2495 2539 77 60
>> 5 Deep Sjeng 1.5 : 31.5/ 70 45.0 2505 2470 61 79
>> 6 Chess Tiger 15.0 : 29.5/ 70 42.1 2507 2452 51 76
>> 7 Ruffian 1.0.5 : 28.0/ 70 40.0 2509 2439 55 74
>> 8 Hiarcs 8 : 23.5/ 70 33.6 2515 2396 57 68
>>
>
>As Jorge said, Chessmaster's book needs to be improved very much. Playing with
>general.ctg instead of remis.ctg, it had a much better performance. But maybe
>there is another book that makes Chessmaster to play even better. Tough
>questions, as we need many many games to prove anything.
>
>My question is how good would you perform, if you participated in this
>tournament instead of Ruffian for example. And playing of course with
>your "boring, playing for a draw" style in every game.
>Do you think you could reach 14.5 points? Would the result be much different, if
>you set CONTEMPT FOR DRAW in that way that engines play for a win?
To play 70 games in a row would first be a very hard task for
me and I can therefore simply say nothing about the outcome.
And with contempt of draw set to win for the engines I have
no experience and do therefore not know the influence of this.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.