Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 23:54:10 09/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 20, 2003 at 02:35:51, Dieter Buerssner wrote:
>On September 19, 2003 at 19:14:00, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>
>>Would 500 cpu's Diep be able to solve (or at least to win) this position:
>>
>>5k2/4R3/2K3p1/4BbPn/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 89
>
>Yace with one CPU:
>
>1141098779 17:32.9 2.62 21. 89.Bd6 Kg8 90.Ra7 Bg4 91.Be5 Kf8 92.Kd6 Bf5
> 93.Rh7 Bg4 94.Kc7 Kg8 95.Re7 Bf3
>1744652790 26:52.9 2.62 22t 89.Bd6 Kg8 90.Ra7 Bg4 91.Be5 Kf8 92.Kd6 Ke8
> 93.Rh7 Kf8 {HT}
>1842109237 28:25.5 2.63 22t+ 89.Kd6 Bg4
>2162801813 33:36.8 2.63 22t 89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Kc7 Ng3H 92.Be5H Nf5H
> 93.Bg3H {HT}
>2376422875 36:55.4 2.63 22. 89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Kc7 Ng3 92.Be5 Nf5
> 93.Bg3
>2965965223 46:11.8 3.03 23++ 89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Kc7 Ng3 92.Be5 Nf5
> 93.Re6 Bh5 94.Kd8 Kh7
>3492135519 54:30.9 4.03 23++ 89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Bh6 Bf5 92.Re8+ Kh7
> 93.Ke7 Nf4 94.Kf8 Ne6+ 95.Kf7 Nc7 96.Re7 Ne6
> 97.Kf6+ Kh8 98.Bg7+ Kh7 99.Re8 Nf8
>3577698695 55:51.8 4.03 23t 89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+ Kg8H 91.Rc7H {HT}
>3774974290 58:54.6 4.03 23. 89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Rc7
>1098543098 1:24:49 4.43 24++ 89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Bh6 Nf4
>1711791222 1:34:01 5.43 24++ 89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Bh6 Bf5 92.Re8+ Kh7
> 93.Ke7 Nf4
> 192377309 2:12:32 10.42 24t 89.Kd6 Bd3 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Kd7H {HT}
>2635534707 2:45:49 10.42 24. 89.Kd6 Bd3 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Kd7
>3277068605 3:55:04 10.82 25++ 89.Kd6 Bd3 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Bh6 Nf4 92.Re3 Bb5
> 93.Re4 Nh5 94.Rb4 Be8 95.Ke7 Bc6 96.Rb8+ Kh7
> 97.Rc8 Ba4 98.Kf8 Nf6 99.gxf6 Bb3 100.f7 Kxh6
> 101.Ke7 Kh5 102.Rc5+ Kg4 103.f8=Q Bf7
>4225920463 5:07:50 11.81 25t 89.Kd6 Bg4 90.Bg7+ Kg8 91.Re8+H Kxg7H 92.Ke7H
> {HT}
>
>Regards,
>Dieter
I should have tried Yace.
Shredder and Hiarcs were not able to solve it in 3 hours (at least on my slow
1.8 GHz AMD computer 3,4,5 men, IDE)
Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.