Author: Wayne Lowrance
Date: 06:20:33 09/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2003 at 04:48:26, stuart taylor wrote: >On September 21, 2003 at 02:45:09, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: > >>On September 20, 2003 at 12:44:38, David Mays wrote: >> >>> I think this engine has only been out for a Week but I haven't heard any news >>>on it, any results, matches, ect, is it a big improvemnt over hiarcs8? Any info >>>would be helpful thanks. >> >>My first experiences with Hiarcs 9 at blitz were not satisfactory. Defeats >>against Junior 8 at 5 and 10 minutes/game. 12-8 and 11,5-8,5. >> >>My feeling about the program radically changed when I played ten long >>(Tournament) games against Shredder 7.04. In my opinion (ELO 2100) the quality >>of the games was excellent and the match finished with 4 wins for each engine >>and only 2 draws. It is clear that only 10 games can not give any stadistically >>reliable reference about the strength of Hiarcs 9, but I feel that this is an >>extraordinary program to play long Tournament games. Congratulations to Mark for >>the big improvement from Hiarcs 8 to 9 version. >> >>Regards, >> >>Tom Casanovas >>Barcelona - Spain. >> >>... by the way, when I finished the match against Shredder 7.04 these games >>dissapeared from my files and I am not able to find them (I am not very skilled >>with files :-( ). Any tips, please?. I would like very much to recover them... > >If these tournament games were even longer timings, would Hiarcs be wining even >more than Shredder 7.04? If so, that is great and can be considered the >strongest on the market, as far as what interests me most. >S.Taylor F8 is king of the hill in infinite analysis for CC. I wonder if H9 is better ? Wayne
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.