Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 11:31:46 09/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 2003 at 14:07:07, Tim Foden wrote: >On September 21, 2003 at 13:39:02, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On September 21, 2003 at 12:43:01, Tim Foden wrote: >> >>>On September 21, 2003 at 11:51:55, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>> >>>>I get yet another thing: >>>> >>>>Sjeng: go >>>>Endgame phase. >>>>Time for move : 1000000 >>>> 0:48 24 -49.68 650674 31486157 a4 b5 axb5 axb5 d4 g5 g4 c5 b4 c4 d5 exd5 >>>h4 d4 exd4 gxh4 >>> >>>Before 4. g4 I get a draw... >>> >>> 12 0.210 +0.000 213683 c4 h5 2. cxb5 cxb5 3. e4 d5 4. exd5 exd5 5. b4 f5 >>> 6. g4 hxg4 7. hxg4 fxg4 8. fxg4 >> >>Mine thinks c4 loses as well: >> >> 0:01 17 0.17 183968 235480 c4 bxc4 bxc4 h5 g4 h4 c5 dxc5 dxc5 f5 gxf5 e >>xf5 e4 g4 fxg4 fxe4 g5 >> 0:01 18 -49.28 183686 236956 c4 ?? >> 0:01 18 -49.91 192251 251850 c4 bxc4 bxc4 h5 g4 h4 c5 dxc5 dxc5 f5 gxf5 >>exf5 e4 g4 fxg4 fxe4 g5 e3 > >[d]8/8/2p1p3/2P2pp1/6Pp/4PP1P/8/8 w - - 0 9 > >After f5, gxf5 is a blunder, which loses. e4 draws here. > >Cheers, Tim. Looks like a problem with rule "3- 'stalemating' the opponent, while still having at least one move for yourself," since after e4 fxe4 fxe4 e5 and white is stalemated. This might be getting socred as a win for Black when it should not be.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.