Author: andy *********
Date: 06:10:36 09/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 2003 at 07:54:39, William Penn wrote: >On September 22, 2003 at 06:54:13, andy ********* wrote: > >>On September 22, 2003 at 05:28:18, scott farrell wrote: >> >>>I am throwing a few dollars behind the NPS problem (hoping to make my java >>>chompster win a little more often than losing). >>> >>>I am trying to work out if the 400fsb helps much, and whether the dual channel >>>DDR makes much diff, or I'll save my pennies and stick with a 2700xp/333/single >>>channel. >>> >>>Has anyone got a benchmark for an 333Fsb athlon (2500xp->2900xp)? >>>and has anyone got a benchmark for a 3000xp? >>> >>>Thanx >>>Scott >> >>With my xp 2400 in dual channel mode, changing the fsb from 266 to 400 keeping >>the same speed 2000MHz , resulted in a approximately 3% increase KN/s using >>Fritz mark. I have always used dual mode and generally the system seems more >>responsive at 400fsb. >> >>Andy > >I also have a xp 2400 and didn't know there were user-selectable modes, single >channel vs dual channel, and fsb 266 vs 400. Can you point me at some FAQs so >that I can also access dual channel mode, and 266/400 fsb, with mine? I'm fairly >ignorant about such things. It's a little computer I picked up from Walmart >recently, that works OK after adding more RAM and a bigger faster hd. >Thanks. >WP With the nforce2 mb , it's possible to have the ram in dual or single mode , it depends on which memory slots you use. The fsb can be changed in the bios. Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.