Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: HIARCS 9 vs. Shredder 7.04 (PGN file)

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 10:49:28 09/22/03

Go up one level in this thread


On September 22, 2003 at 10:14:48, Sally Weltrop wrote:

>From what I have seen H9 justs mauls Shredder. A lot of X's Shredder doesn't
>even see it coming until it is too late. Looks like H9 evaluation is more in
>line with what u could expect in real life if a position is played properly.
>
>Hats off to Mark and his hard work in making a fine engine. Ohh I forgot one
>other thing. I used 128 MB hash for HIARCS 9 when it's optimized for 192 so it
>still did good.
>
>This engine WILL be #1 in the future SSDF lists.

You have made your prediction of a 40/2 contest based on a handful of blitz
games.

It may be stronger, but your test environment cannot predict SSDF outcomes
because it is grotesquely different.

IMO-YMMV



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.