Author: Sally Weltrop
Date: 13:12:09 09/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 2003 at 13:49:28, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 22, 2003 at 10:14:48, Sally Weltrop wrote: > >>From what I have seen H9 justs mauls Shredder. A lot of X's Shredder doesn't >>even see it coming until it is too late. Looks like H9 evaluation is more in >>line with what u could expect in real life if a position is played properly. >> >>Hats off to Mark and his hard work in making a fine engine. Ohh I forgot one >>other thing. I used 128 MB hash for HIARCS 9 when it's optimized for 192 so it >>still did good. >> >>This engine WILL be #1 in the future SSDF lists. > >You have made your prediction of a 40/2 contest based on a handful of blitz >games. > >It may be stronger, but your test environment cannot predict SSDF outcomes >because it is grotesquely different. Not that much different. if HIARCS8 played Shredder 7.04 to a standstill and this ver (9) is doing a number on it ... I think it's logical to say it'll b much better. Is HIARCS9 going to do worse with more time? probably Shredder will get stronger, maybe HIARCS9 will too. Just wait & see > >IMO-YMMV
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.