Author: Bo Persson
Date: 15:01:06 09/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 2003 at 17:51:21, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On September 22, 2003 at 17:33:35, Bo Persson wrote: > >>On September 22, 2003 at 15:40:20, Dan Andersson wrote: >> >>> Polymorphism is considered a cornerstone of OOP. >> >>Here is where the religious aspects start. :-) >> >>How do you apply that to a chess game? > >That is dangerously close to "I never did it therefore it's not possible". :)) Yes, could be. The problem seems to be that I cannot write a "proper" OO chess program just because I cannot find a good place to add enough polymorphism. snip > >In summary, I think that there's no speed penalty if you use C++ just as a >better C. There's a speed penalty when you really use some OO-design, but it >doesn't have to be completely slow, depending on how clever you do things. Yes, but I just use objects because it improves my program. If I did it "properly" OO, I'm sure I could make it run real slow too. :-) Bo Persson > >Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.