Author: stuart taylor
Date: 22:58:59 09/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
Why is it that when Hiarcs just came out, its first blitz games showed it was certainly not the best, but when one or two longer games were played, it was seen to look very slightly stronger than its top rivals, but that, at the expense of Blitz. And now, even Blitz, according to Sally Weltrop, H9 is doing much better than even Shr.7.04? And, maybe, this will make Hiarcs certainly not weaker than that margin against Shr.7.04 in longer games. My question is why didn't it seem like this on the first day of testings, but get slightly better each time someone tested more? Does it take a computer program to "find its feet" as if it were a human? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.