Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: HIARCS 9 vs. Shredder 7.04 (PGN file)

Author: Sally Weltrop

Date: 02:55:48 09/23/03

Go up one level in this thread


On September 23, 2003 at 05:44:43, Chessfun wrote:

>On September 22, 2003 at 11:13:56, Art Patterson wrote:
>
>>On September 22, 2003 at 10:14:48, Sally Weltrop wrote:
>>
>>>From what I have seen H9 justs mauls Shredder. A lot of X's Shredder doesn't
>>>even see it coming until it is too late. Looks like H9 evaluation is more in
>>>line with what u could expect in real life if a position is played properly.
>>>
>>>Hats off to Mark and his hard work in making a fine engine. Ohh I forgot one
>>>other thing. I used 128 MB hash for HIARCS 9 when it's optimized for 192 so it
>>>still did good.
>>>
>>>This engine WILL be #1 in the future SSDF lists.
>>
>>
>>yeah that's what they all said about hiarcs 7
>
>If I remember correctly Hiarcs 7 was at one point 1st in the SSDF rating list.

I thought so too.
>
>Sarah.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.