Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 20:39:44 09/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 24, 2003 at 19:57:57, Robert Hyatt wrote: >However, I've never had a system where I could not use 3/4 of memory _at least_ >for hashing. IE for a 512mb system, that is 384mb. That still leaves 128mb >for the OS and the program itself, and filesystem cache, and egtb cache, and >pawn hash, and whatever else... I have a 512 MB system here. Under Windows 2000, with only a firewall and antivirus running (which only consume ~8MB of memory), 156 MB of physical memory is in use. That "128 MB for everything else" is nonexistant. Even if I got rid of the firewall and antivirus, and killed off a few other nonvital OS processes, we're pushing it to even get to the point where the OS is using 128 MB. Now, runnning linux, we're talking about a whole different ball game. My (more or less) default install of Redhat 9 consumes 160MB when running Gnome, and 113 MB in single user mode (I was a bit suprised by this). I suspect that you could minimize the linux OS memory usage to virtually nothing, if you really wanted to, and use 99% of it for your program. I remember reading newsgroup archives of people saying you could run linux on a machine with less than 1MB of memory. There is a difference between you, a _very_ experienced linux/unix user, saying that you try to use all of the memory in linux, and the casual Crafty user running windows trying to use all of the memory based upon your recommendation :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.