Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: For Ed: thanks for a quick answer - explanation

Author: Werner Schuele

Date: 02:01:05 09/26/03

Go up one level in this thread


Hi Ed, here in other words:
when you would try to make a rebel.eng similar to those of Thorstens, but
without these singular extensions, which parameters do you use instead?

Or is it ok, if we use these parameters together?



[Pruning ? MISC_12]             * other extensions
[Pruning ? SEX_MAX_MIDG_5]      *
[Pruning ? SEX_MAX_ENDG_3]      * Misc_44 New endgame extension
[Pruning ? SEX_MARGIN=0.75]     *
[Pruning ? SEX_HIST_DEPTH_4]    *
[Pruning ? SEX_MIDG_CHECKS]     * misc_34, misc_32, misc_28 Single (more) check
extension
[Pruning ? SEX_MIDG_CAPTURES]   * misc_38 New capture extension
[Pruning ? SEX_MIDG_PROM]       * misc_ 46 6th rank extension
[Pruning ? SEX_ENDG_CHECKS]     * misc_28
[Pruning ? SEX_ENDG_CAPTURES]   *
[Pruning ? SEX_ENDG_PROM]       * misc_46 6th rank extension

Greetings
Werner


>>You do not use these extensions anymore but Thorsten. Are there other extension
>>parameters for Rebel 12 which do the same? If so, which one do the same things
>>descriped upon?
>
>
>Hi Werner,
>
>I am not sure how to answer this as your question is a bit misty. There is only
>one singular extension algorithm, the one you listed. Other extension parameters
>in general do total other things although there is an overlap because in the end
>you are trying to extend the moves that matter.
>
>My best,
>
>Ed



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.