Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:08:43 09/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2003 at 05:01:05, Werner Schuele wrote: >Hi Ed, here in other words: >when you would try to make a rebel.eng similar to those of Thorstens, but >without these singular extensions, which parameters do you use instead? > >Or is it ok, if we use these parameters together? ed HAS done some styles that work on the base of my evaluations settings and HIS search stuff. IMO those styles are weaker, but HE believes in it. the problem with many switches in rebel is that when you mix them with others you weaken rebel. there is IMO no easy way to find out about this WITHOUT TRYING IT OUT WITH EACH COMBINATION of switches. and this takes time, as you can imagine. e.g. this is a style ed likes: [Personality = REBEL3.ENG] * Rebel 12 (risky 1.00) [Pawn Value = 98] * 98 [Knight Value = 99] * 99 [Bishop Value = 101] * 101 [Rook Value = 102] * 102 [Queen Value = 105] * 105 [King Safety = 139] * 139 [Mobility = 120] * 120 [Pawn Structure = 95] * 95 [Passed Pawns = 105] * 105 [Passed Pawn King Tropism = 120] * 120 [Traditional Isolated Pawns = 80] * 80 [Progressive Isolated Pawns = 125] * 125 [Pins = 110] * 110 [Bishop Pair = 101] * 101 [Chess Knowledge = 200] * 200 [Attractiveness = 119] * 119 [Attacking = 125] * 125 [Strength of Play = 100] [Draw Contempt Factor = 0.00] [Selective Search = 100] [Search Technique = NULLMOVE] [Engine Learner = off] * off|on [Book Learner = aggressive] * off|passive|moderate|strong|aggressive [Position Learner = on] * off|on [Extended Book Learner = off] * off|read|write|read&write [Pruning = MISC_03] [Pruning = MISC_29] [Pruning = MISC_49] [Pruning = MISC_09] [Pruning = MISC_10] [Pruning = MISC09_3.00] [Pruning = MISC10_5.00] [Pruning = MISC_17] [Pruning = MISC17_DEPTH_10] [Search Safety MIDG = 100] [Search Safety END0 = 150] [Search Safety END1 = 200] [Search Safety END2 = 200] [Center Control = 25] [Bishop Mobility = 25] [Right to Move = 75] [Strong Squares = 125] [ANTI-GM = OFF] [EVALUATION = NORMAL] [Extensions (remaining)= 3] [Extensions (checks)= 0] [Extensions (captures)= 0] IMO many switches in this style that are ON do not fit with my SEX. e.g. MISC 9/10 is not working together with SEX. it seems those fail high reductions do not work with SEX. Also i was not able to find out that MISC 29/49 brings ANY kind of progress concerning strength.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.