Author: Alexander Yates
Date: 13:27:27 09/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2003 at 15:04:24, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On September 26, 2003 at 14:54:00, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>There is no doubt in the meantime that Hiarcs9 is >>much stronger (50-70 Elo) than Hiarcs8. But you >>can't test this by playing H9 vs H8 or H9 vs >>H8 Bareev. The only thing that counts are results >>vs other programs. Please have a look at >>http://www.computerschach.de/rangliste/Blitzrangliste.htm >>Kurt > > Another link of blitz games 10m+10s > http://www.computerschach.de/rangliste/ > to demonstrate the strenght of Hiarcs9. > Kurt I agree to a point, but an improved program should defeat its predecessor if it's strong enough. Also, let me suggest testing Hiarcs 8 Bareev, it may surprise you!:-) Alex
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.