Author: John Merlino
Date: 13:36:02 09/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2003 at 15:55:20, Mihaly Szalai wrote: >On September 26, 2003 at 15:33:53, John Merlino wrote: > >>On September 26, 2003 at 14:00:19, Mihaly Szalai wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>Thank you, John. You may find interesting that The King is faster >>>in solving this position under the Fritz GUI (with the Malin >>>adapter, default settings) on my slower machine (Celeron 1.7 Ghz). >>>Here is the output from Fritz and below that is the output from >>>the CM 9000 GUI. >>> >>> >>>New game >>>8/7p/6pP/1B4P1/pp6/1k1K4/8/8 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by The King 3.23d: >>> >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 >>> µ (-0.88) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >>>1.Bc4+ Kb2 2.Bg8 a3 3.Bxh7 >>> ł (-0.70) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >>>1.Bc4+ Kb2 2.Bg8 a3 3.Bxh7 >>> ł (-0.70) Depth: 4 00:00:00 >>>1.Bc4+ Kb2 2.Bf7 a3 3.Bxg6 a2 4.Bxh7 a1Q >>> -+ (-2.23) Depth: 5 00:00:00 >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 a2 3.Bxh7 a1Q 4.g6 >>> -+ (-2.09) Depth: 5 00:00:00 >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 Kb2 3.Bxh7 a2 4.Kc4 a1Q 5.Kxb4 >>> µ (-0.75) Depth: 6 00:00:00 6kN >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 Kb2 3.Bxh7 a2 4.Kc4 a1Q 5.Kxb4 >>> µ (-0.75) Depth: 7 00:00:00 14kN >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8Q a1Q 5.Qxa1 >>> = (0.00) Depth: 8 00:00:00 36kN >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8Q a1Q 5.Qxa1 >>> = (0.00) Depth: 9 00:00:00 70kN >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8Q a1Q 5.Qxa1 >>> = (0.00) Depth: 10 00:00:00 139kN >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8Q a1Q 5.Qxa1 >>> = (0.00) Depth: 11 00:00:01 256kN >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8Q a1Q 5.Qxa1 >>> = (0.00) Depth: 12 00:00:02 492kN >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8Q a1Q 5.Qxa1 >>> = (0.00) Depth: 13 00:00:04 962kN >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8Q a1Q 5.Qxa1 >>> = (0.00) Depth: 14 00:00:09 2001kN >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8B Ka3 5.Kc2 b3+ 6.Kc1 Ka4 7.Kb2 Kb4 8.Bg7 Kc4 >>>9.Ka3 Kc5 10.Kxb3 >>> ± (0.98) Depth: 15 00:00:24 5005kN >>>1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8B Ka3 5.Kc2 b3+ 6.Kc1 Ka4 7.Kb2 Kb4 8.Bg7 a1Q+ >>>9.Kxa1 Kb5 10.Kb2 Kb4 11.Be5 Kc4 >>> +- (1.86) Depth: 16 00:00:56 11395kN >>> >>>(Szalai, MyTown 26.09.2003) >>> >>>CM 9000: >>> >>>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>>0:01 8/12 0.00 244835 1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8=Q >>> a1=Q 5.Qxa1 >>>0:02 9/13 0.00 459719 1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8=Q >>> a1=Q 5.Qxa1 >>>0:04 10/14 0.00 917335 1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8=Q >>> a1=Q 5.Qxa1 >>>0:09 11/15 0.00 1887372 1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8=Q >>> a1=Q 5.Qxa1 >>>0:20 12/16 0.00 4010653 1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8=Q >>> a1=Q 5.Qxa1 >>>0:45 13/17 0.00 8912233 1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8=Q >>> a1=Q 5.Qxa1 >>>3:25 14/18 3.11 37142500 1.Be8 a3 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.h7 a2 4.h8=B >>> Ka3 5.Kc2 b3+ 6.Kc1 Ka4 7.Kb2 Kb4 >>> 8.Bg7 Kc4 9.Ka3 Kd5 10.Kxb3 Ke4 >>> 11.Kxa2 Kf5 >> >>I suspect you are using a different personality than the default, which is what >>I used. The depth difference shown above makes this clear, I think.... >> >>jm > > >No, this is the default personality, I checked it. > >Mihaly The only other possible difference would be the hash table size, but it certainly shouldn't account for an almost 400% difference in speed. I'll check my machine at home and make sure it was using 32MB (more than enough for this position). How much are you using? jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.