Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Sign of Integer Operands: int vs unsigned int

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 09:26:00 09/27/03

Go up one level in this thread


On September 27, 2003 at 10:32:53, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>For example, x[0] and x[2] cannot possibly refer to the same
>memory location, while *p and *q could. It is highly
>recommended to use the array style, as significant performance
>advantages can be achieved with most compilers.

First, this seems like a compiler specific issue rather than something that
should be in the AMD optimization guide, unless AMD has a compiler I don't know
about.

Second, does this only apply to code that makes use of multiple pointers in the
same code? For instance, if I loop through an array using a local pointer, but
don't make use of any other pointers in the same function, there should be no
pointer conflict. I know that MSVC has an option "assume no aliasing". I've
never had a speed boost from "assume no aliasing", and I use a single pointer in
some places, but almost never multiple pointers together.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.