Author: Telmo Escobar
Date: 13:11:27 09/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 2003 at 20:30:26, Nolan Denson wrote: >X-Engine (2894) vs. TheGreatDane (2730) --- 2003.09.26 18:54:22 407 Rated Blitz >match, initial time: 10 minutes, increment: 6 seconds > >Notice the hardware ! of X-engine > >1: ChessTiger 15 - Gambit Style. I don't wanna play vs other Tiger clones ! > 2: AthlonXP 3200+, 1GB RAM, WindowsXP, all 3-5 EGTB > > > 1. d4 (0:02) d5 (0:00) > 2. c4 (0:00) dxc4 (0:00) > 3. Nf3 (0:00) Nf6 (0:00) > 4. e3 (0:00) e6 (0:00) > 5. Bxc4 (0:00) c5 (0:00) > 6. Qe2 (0:00) a6 (0:00) > 7. dxc5 (0:00) Bxc5 (0:00) > 8. O-O (0:00) Nc6 (0:00) > 9. e4 (0:00) Qc7 (0:00) > 10. e5 (0:00) Nd7 (0:00) > 11. Bf4 (0:00) b5 (0:00) > 12. Bd3 (0:00) Bb7 (0:00) > 13. Nc3 (0:00) Nb4 (0:00) > 14. Be4 (0:00) Bxe4 (0:00) > 15. Nxe4 (0:00) Nd5 (0:00) > 16. Bg3 (0:00) O-O (0:00) > 17. Rac1 (0:20) h6 (0:36) > 18. b4 (0:27) Nxb4 (0:27) > 19. Rxc5 (0:49) Nxc5 (0:32) > 20. Rc1 (0:17) Nbd3 (0:40) > 21. Qxd3 (0:56) Nxd3 (0:00) > 22. Rxc7 (0:22) Rfc8 (0:14) > It's plain that Chess Tiger has evaluated incorrectly the endgame, thinking White is winning. Human chess players know that rook+pawn are often stronger than two minor pieces, as the rook becomes increasingly agile at the endgame. It would be interesting to know what other engines have this evaluation bug sas well. Telmo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.