Author: blass uri
Date: 07:23:52 11/06/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 05, 1998 at 18:39:21, odell hall wrote: >Yes Mr. Schoeder this is pretty convincing evidence That computers are >Grandmaster Level or slightly below!! I don't think I have seen one performance >by rebel9 which was below grandmaster level. Yet people continually say they are >not grandmasters, which to me appears to be based on emotional considerations >rather than factual considerations. This posting by you is just one more proof >in a long line of other proofs I have seen. I challenge anyone to produce a >less than grandmaster result by rebel!! Rebel10 did a draw with mark young(mark young is less than an expert) in his first game and I think that it is less than a grandmaster result. It was not tournament time control but long time control give advantage for the human and not for the computer. I think that if masters will play for a draw against top programs you will see less than a grandmaster result easily. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.