Author: enrico carrisco
Date: 20:15:49 09/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 27, 2003 at 21:28:54, Christophe Theron wrote: <snip> >>>> >>>>the only improvements i see in tiger since version 0.0001 which impressed >>>>tactically in paderborn a lot of years ago when operated by Thorsten Czub, >>>>is that tigers evaluation has become better. >>>> >>>>I see not a single other improvement in tiger that i find worth mentionning. >>> >>> >>> >>>Fortunately I do not work in the purpose of impressing you. >>> >>>If I did, maybe I would look for a 501 processors computer... That's as >>>impressive as useless, but maybe some like it... >> >>what's wrong with going lossless a few plies deeper? > > > >What is wrong is the idea of stacking a pile of hardware that *nobody* will ever >really use for that purpose and to claim any superiority from that. > > > > Christophe It could be thought of as a double-edged sword of sorts.. If DIEP gets its ass handed to it when running on brute hardware such as that, well... -elc.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.