Author: Derek Paquette
Date: 23:42:01 09/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 2003 at 00:15:02, Mark Young wrote: >H. Pillsbury - Em. Lasker >After whites 17 move of f5 > >[D]2r2rk1/pp3pp1/4bb1p/q2p1P1Q/3P4/2N5/PP4PP/1K1R1B1R b - - 0 1 > >Here GM Kasparov gives 17..Rxc3 a (!!) mark. With the comment that the move >Rxc3!! is beyond the powers of even a strong computer. > >Is Rxc3 really beyond the powers of a strong computer? Or is the move Rxc3 not >worthy of a (!!) because it leads only to a draw. This is what the computers see >after blacks 17..Rxc3. Kasparov likes to say a lot of things, same with Vlad. These guys both claim that Junior and Df7 are stronger than DBII, but DBII only had a 4000 position openning book compared to hundreds of thousands to low millions of these others... no comparison really
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.