Author: Albert Silver
Date: 17:35:52 09/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 2003 at 18:23:29, Andreas Guettinger wrote:
>On September 28, 2003 at 14:21:10, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On September 28, 2003 at 11:12:23, Andreas Guettinger wrote:
>>
>>>On September 28, 2003 at 08:23:19, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On September 28, 2003 at 07:57:21, Peter Stayne wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>er... make that '...it figures Rxd7 to be the 35th best move...'
>>>>
>>>>programs usually do not calculate exact score for every move.
>>>>
>>>>Here is some analysis of Yace(pay attention to the note at the end of the
>>>>analysis)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Since the PV is the same from depth 0 to depth 12, could it be that it was
>>>already in the hashtable??
>>>
>>>regards
>>>Andy
>>
>>Reread Uri's last phrase below.
>>
>> Albert
>>
>>>>small note:some learning from previous anbalysis helped to achieve this result.
>>>>
>>>>Uri
>
>I dunno, for me there is a difference between learning and having the position
>in HT. Learning is perserved during a restart of the program, HT is cleared.
>
>IMHO
>Andy
Learning *is* from the hashtable.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.