Author: Jeroen van Dorp
Date: 09:04:53 09/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 29, 2003 at 05:51:40, Drexel,Michael wrote: >I think I made it clear enough that my test was intended to find the best >engines for interactive Analysis ONLY. >So when the move quickly shows up I see it in the engine windows pane. >After that I can check myself whether the move is good or not. > >I never trust the engines output anyway. >Important is only to not miss a deep tactical possibility. I think you basically agree with each other about the proper test methode and the value of the result. You state that _you're_ not interested in it. You want an on the fly analysis. But at the same time you "don't trust" the analysis and want to check it manually. And rightfully, because you certainly will miss "deep tactical possibilites" as well, as can be easily proven with letting those test suites running the full time - or even longer. Especially in the tactical suites the hard positions are the ones with the deep tactical possibilities, which are often not find, while the quick tactics are easily identified. So you basically want an on the fly analysis which has no value to you as well, yet you want to test the value of with test suites. It seems like you just argued that you tested and achieved test results that have no value at all. J.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.