Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 11:16:01 09/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On September 29, 2003 at 03:31:07, Johan de Koning wrote: >On September 28, 2003 at 06:38:06, Darren Rushton wrote: > >>On September 27, 2003 at 01:29:14, John Merlino wrote: >> >>>On September 26, 2003 at 21:22:26, Mike Byrne wrote: >>> >>>>http://www.chessbase.com/games/2003/03kaspazmaicrete.htm >>>> >>>>[d]r4rk1/4q1pp/pQpbpnp1/3p4/N2P4/4PP2/PP1B2PP/2R1K2R b K - 0 17 >>>> >>>>17...Ne4! ouch! >>> >> >>Sorry, but how is this a "stunning move"? > >The move is stunning because it looks cute. >The move is stunning because it ends the game. >The move is stunning because chess programs think it's drawish. Even single cpu K7 diep doesn't see this as a draw within 1 second :) After a while black up a pawn. Needed 0.75 seconds to benchmark DIEPINT=1857142 a second ==> usec50=93 initdataproc0 has for nbytes=350M Global Shared Transtable=350M for 1 procs local=350M bytes Local pawnhashsize = 4200K Local evalhashsize = 34M Clearing all NUMA hashtables! Clearing all NUMA hashtables! putting engine to search errorlevel=0! 00:00 4 0k 0 0 4 (1) 1 (0,0) -3.013 Bd6xh2 Rh1xh2 00:00 7 0k 0 0 7 (1) 1 (0,0) -0.025 Rf8-f7 Rc1xc6 00:00 17 0k 0 0 17 (1) 1 (0,0) 0.409 e6-e5 Rc1xc6 00:00 138 0k 0 0 138 (1) 2 (0,1) -0.002 e6-e5 d4xe5 Bd6xe5 Rc1xc6 ++ f8-b8 procnr=0 terug=88 org=[-2;-1] newwindow=[-2;520000] 00:00 252 0k 0 0 252 (1) 2 (0,1) 0.264 Rf8-b8 Qb6xc6 00:00 591 1k 0 0 591 (1) 3 (0,2) 0.796 Rf8-b8 Qb6xc6 e6-e5 00:00 83666 84k 0 0 2510 (1) 4 (0,3) -0.630 Rf8-b8 Qb6xc6 Bd6-b4 Bd2xb4 Qe7xb4 Ke1-f2 ++ e6-e5 procnr=0 terug=-585 org=[-630;-629] newwindow=[-630;520000] 00:00 83733 84k 0 0 5024 (1) 4 (0,3) -0.132 e6-e5 d4xe5 Bd6xe5 Bd2-b4 ++ f8-c8 procnr=0 terug=-126 org=[-132;-131] newwindow=[-132;520000] 00:00 88875 89k 0 0 7110 (1) 4 (0,3) -0.116 Rf8-c8 O-O Nf6-d7 Qb6-b3 ++ f6-d7 procnr=0 terug=-77 org=[-116;-115] newwindow=[-116;520000] 00:00 92766 93k 0 0 8349 (1) 4 (0,3) 0.001 Nf6-d7 Qb6xc6 Qe7-h4 Ke1-e2 00:00 92360 92k 0 0 13854 (1) 5 (0,4) -0.346 Nf6-d7 Qb6xc6 Qe7-h4 Ke1-e2 Qh4-e 7 Na4-c5 Nd7xc5 d4xc5 ++ f8-c8 procnr=0 terug=-307 org=[-346;-345] newwindow=[-346;520000] 00:00 93500 94k 0 0 18700 (1) 5 (0,4) 0.010 Rf8-c8 Rc1xc6 Rc8xc6 Qb6xc6 Ra8-a7 00:00 93437 93k 0 0 47653 (1) 6 (0,5) -0.137 Rf8-c8 Rc1xc6 Rc8-b8 Qb6-a5 Rb8-b 5 Qa5-c3 ++ f6-e4 procnr=0 terug=-136 org=[-137;-136] newwindow=[-137;520000] 00:01 95086 95k 0 0 132170 (1) 6 (0,5) 0.001 Nf6-e4 f3xe4 Qe7-h4 Ke1-d1 Qh4-g4 Kd1-c2 Qg4xe4 Kc2-c3 Qe4xg2 Qb6xc6 00:01 95282 95k 0 0 183895 (1) 7 (0,6) 0.186 Nf6-e4 f3xe4 Qe7-h4 g2-g3 Bd6xg3 Ke1-e2 Qh4-g4 Ke2-d3 Qg4xe4 Kd3-c3 00:05 95613 96k 0 0 546911 (1) 8 (0,7) 0.457 Nf6-e4 f3xe4 Qe7-h4 Ke1-d1 Qh4-g4 Kd1-c2 Qg4xe4 Kc2-d1 Qe4xg2 Rh1-e1 Qg2xh2 Rc1xc6 00:09 99373 99k 0 0 928148 (1) 9 (0,8) 0.340 Nf6-e4 f3xe4 Qe7-h4 g2-g3 Bd6xg3 Ke1-e2 Rf8-f2 Ke2-d3 Qh4xe4 Kd3-c3 Bg3xh2 Na4-c5 00:25 97869 98k 0 0 2484916 (1) 10 (0,9) 0.550 Nf6-e4 f3xe4 Qe7-h4 g2-g3 Bd6xg 3 Ke1-d1 Qh4xe4 h2xg3 Qe4xh1 Kd1-c2 Qh1-e4 Kc2-d1 00:45 97630 98k 0 0 4408017 (1) 11 (0,10) 0.136 Nf6-e4 f3xe4 Qe7-h4 g2-g3 Qh4- h5 e4-e5 Bd6xe5 Rh1-f1 Rf8xf1 Ke1xf1 Qh5xh2 d4xe5 Ra8-f8 Kf1-e1 Qh2xg3 Ke1-e2 Qg 3-g4 Ke2-d3 Qg4xa4 Rc1xc6 Qa4xa2 Qb6xa6 Qa2-b3 Bd2-c3 06:56 92533 93k 0 0 38581697 (1) 12 (0,11) 0.946 Nf6-e4 h2-h4 Bd6-g3 Ke1-e2 Bg 3-c7 Qb6xc6 Ne4-g3 Ke2-d3 Ng3xh1 Qc6xc7 Qe7xh4 Bd2-e1 Nh1-f2 Kd3-e2 Rf8-f7 >>Crafty, after 1hrs. worth of thinking sees a draw! >> >>Depth: 15 Nodes: 744502161 (195693 n/s) >>Score: +0.00 Time: 3804.43 seconds >>17. ... Ne4 18. fxe4 Qh4+ 19. Kd1 Qg4+ 20. Kc2 Qxe4+ 21. Kd1 Rab8 22. Qa5 Qxg2 >>23. Re1 Qg4+ 24. Kc2 Qe4+ 25. Kd1 Qg4+ > >Replace 22 ... Qxg2 with Rf2, and see White collapsing within 10 or so plies. >That's just one of the many variations that Kasparov did not look at. :-) > >... Johan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.