Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Example for the potential of the new Botvinik-Makaroff-Threat-Extensions

Author: Grzegorz Sidorowicz

Date: 07:13:13 10/02/03

Go up one level in this thread

On October 02, 2003 at 10:02:58, Grzegorz Sidorowicz wrote:

>
>>>My Armageddon 2.250 on PIV 2Ghz without any magic extension
>>>can solve it fast and I think it is not bug.
>>
>>This is the line that it needs to see in order to solve it.
>>If 10 plies are enough then you do a lot of extensions.
>
>
>Armageddon extension:
>1. check (always),
>2. capture on the same square if SEE>=0 and
>   we are not in check and opponent move was
>   capture
>3. if we have got only one move
>
>...but if I detect check in QSearch I generate all moves.
>More extension I can't remember :-)
>
>Grzegorz


Second point again :-)
2. capture on the same square if SEE>=0 and
   we are not in check and opponent move was
   capture with SEE>=0

• Re: Example for the potential of the new Botvinik-Makaroff-Threat-Extensions Uri Blass 07:44:06 10/02/03
  • Re: Example for the potential of the new Botvinik-Makaroff-Threat-Extensions Grzegorz Sidorowicz 08:10:12 10/02/03
    • Re: Example for the potential of the new Botvinik-Makaroff-Threat-Extensions Uri Blass 08:56:57 10/02/03
      • Re: Example for the potential of the new Botvinik-Makaroff-Threat-Extensions Grzegorz Sidorowicz 00:22:44 10/03/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.