Author: stuart taylor
Date: 13:05:54 10/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 2003 at 05:32:56, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On October 01, 2003 at 19:45:38, Roger D Davis wrote: > >>On October 01, 2003 at 16:51:51, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >> >>>20 years ago, an home computer, who run a chess engine, weight about 1600, now >>>about 2600. >>>What will be strenght of chess computer in 2013 ? >>> >>>Please give your oppinion ... >>>(3100 is tempting :o) ) >> >>Problem is, in the past there was something to shoot for: Grandmaster moves >>definitely better than those produced by computers, even at shorter time >>controls. However, soon we'll be in a phase where it's no longer clear that >>grandmaster moves are superior. In fact, we might be entering a phase where >>there are only stylistic differences between programs. That is, computers might >>be able to find, for many positions, multiple good moves that all represent >>perfect play because they all draw. > >That is not perfect play. The goal in chess is to beat your opponents(IE to get >as many points as possible) and not to never lose against any opponent. >In order to do that you have to pose him/it problems he/it is not able to solve. > >No one knows, because no one knows what the >>whole chess tree looks like, and never will. >> >>roger If you have a chess program which NEVER EVER loses, then I think it will easily surpass 3000 any time. It will obviously present many problems too, as that ability is a necesity to never ever lose. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.