Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: does this look normal?

Author: macaroni

Date: 18:01:23 10/02/03

does this look like a reasonable branching factor? for this evaluation I had
killers, history, and captures all turned on as move ordering. I do have null
moving with R of 2.

Analyzing the position after 1. a3
1 7 	0 	22 		Nf6
2 2 	0 	110 		Nf6 d4
3 7 	0 	269 		Nf6 d4 Nc6
4 2 	0 	1616 		Nf6 d4 Nc6 Nf3
5 7 	6 	5012 		Nf6 d4 Nc6 Nc3 e5
6 2 	39 	38381 		Nf6 d4 Nc6 Nf3 d5 Nc3
7 4 	269 	246052 		Nf6 d4 Nc6 Nc3 d5 Nf3 Qd6
8 4 	555 	531125 		Nf6 Nf3 Nc6 Nc3 d5 d4 Qd6 e3
9 5 	1813 	1674270 	Nf6 Nc3 Nc6 d4 d5 Bf4 Nh5 Be5 Nf6

if not. What sort of things can improve it? my quiescent search is still fairly
basic, no SEE, but it only looks at moves that bring it within 50 of alpha.
thanks.

• No, it looks infected. <NT> Roy Eassa 11:43:23 10/05/03
• In a nutshell: you have bugs Anthony Cozzie 05:31:03 10/03/03
  • Re: In a nutshell: you have bugs macaroni 16:01:37 10/03/03
• Re: does this look normal? Dann Corbit 18:14:31 10/02/03
  • Re: Measuring branching factor Tord Romstad 02:44:49 10/03/03
    • Re: Measuring branching factor Dann Corbit 11:52:53 10/03/03
  • Re: does this look normal? Dann Corbit 18:15:49 10/02/03
    • Re: does this look normal? macaroni 18:29:01 10/02/03
      • Re: does this look normal? Dann Corbit 19:46:14 10/02/03
        • Re: does this look normal? (Dead links?) F. Jermann 02:40:52 10/03/03
        • Re: does this look normal? Dave Gomboc 21:19:09 10/02/03
          • Re: does this look normal? Dann Corbit 21:23:13 10/02/03

This page took 0.04 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.