Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Tournament results

Author: Mark Young

Date: 06:50:21 11/07/98

Go up one level in this thread


On November 07, 1998 at 09:17:47, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On November 06, 1998 at 23:56:57, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>>            H7b    J5     R10    F5     TOTAL    %   Played
>>>Hiarcs 7b   ---     4      7      8      19    63.3    30
>>>Junior 5     6     ---     5     4.5    15.5   51.7    30
>>>Rebel 10     3      5     ---    5.5    13.5   45.0    30
>>>Fritz 5      2     5.5    4.5    ---     12    40.0    30
>
>Your results is exactly what i get , my results are a little weaker for fritz,
>would say 35-40% when I play with my fritz5 manually.
>
>So YOUR fritz is not stronger than mine ! :-)))
>
>Only when you let it play in sweden, it gets better elo's.
>
>>>- Fritz 5 simply didn't have a chance and was outplayed by H7b in all phases of
>>>the game. Fritz drew 4 games, lost 6 and won none.
>
>This is exactly what the normal customer gets. what we all get when we buy it
>legally and for money, and of course this disapoints any customer.
>Therefore i would say, fritz is not worth the money and all the
>elo ratings that come from ssdf does not reflect the strength of fritz5 but
>something else, what we have not found out so far.
>You call it luck. I call it cheating.
>
>but i am looking forward that we will find out about the betrayal soon.
>I have heard there are new facts about HOW they do it.
>
>This will hopefully explain why the customers get betrayed...

First of all, Nice to see you back. I disagree with you, but did not want to see
you kick out of CCC.

Like I said, If you show me proof, I will change my opinion, but my results with
Fritz 5 have been tops. So I can not knock Fritz 5 like you, without proof.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.