Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 15:49:48 10/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2003 at 18:37:52, Dan Andersson wrote: Yes sorry for confusing. Conspiracy Number Search and later extended by Ulf to controlled parallel conspiracy number search, Is different from this cheap stuff the dudes wrote. Why was it allowed to be called conspiracy ni the first place? Any study of 1 afternoon will put this research back to ashes, where Ulf's work is years of work. The implementation done in diep was based upon the original Conspiracy Number search and as i already wrote down, that took months. >I siply stated the fact that you have already confused ABC with Controlled >Conspiracy search. They are not the same. As you relly should know. > And I have the link to prove it now that the search engine is back online. >http://www.chess-archive.com/ccc.php?art_id=85268 >And if it goes down again here it is: > >--- >>Does someone have experience with Alpha-Beta-Conspiracy Search? I have read the >>draft of 1993 and it seems to me a very interesting scheme for selective search. >> >>Alessandro > >Ulf Lorenz (university paderborn) has made a program called: P.Conners... >...Parallel Conspiracy number search > >It plays pretty well. By far the best selective searching program made. >Nothing using entirely conspiracy or proof number search comes even close >to its strength. > >Vincent > >--- > >MvH Dan Andersson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.